Course record THA

THA 1301

Voice for the Actor

Texas Tech University

3 sections18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2025
Flunk Score62/100
Strong

Professors 18 of 18

Amanda Espinoza 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.82GPA
82.0% A
18.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Lauren Miller 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.50GPA
65.0% A
20.0% B
15.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rachel Hirshorn 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.08GPA
52.7% A
28.6% B
5.5% C
0.0% D
13.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Eric Christopher Skiles 22 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.82
Wayne L Magruder 12 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Troy Matthew Lescher 19 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Elizabeth Parks 12 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Marie Downing 14 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Rachel A. Hirshorn-Johnston 8 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Alex Webster 15 median item responses 3.04Eval / 5
Overall3.04 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.33
Course assignments facilitated learning2.67
Opportunities to be successful in course3.13
Leah Johnson 10 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Troy L. Scarborough 11 median item responses 3.21Eval / 5
Overall3.21 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.96
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.18
Madeline Hiatt 11 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Rengim Melis Kose 8 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.78
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Victoria R. Denike 15 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.87
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.87
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
David Lewis Wygant 19 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.74
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.61
Kristen Rogers 20 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.85
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.85
Courtney Brown 15 median item responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course4.23
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.24
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.37
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.31
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.03
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 8

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Hirshorn-Johnston, Rachel

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
5 more syllabi

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Hirshorn-Johnston, Rachel

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Hirshorn-Johnston, Rachel

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.