Course record SPAN

SPAN 4335

Internship in Spanish

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2003–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 16

Lorum H. Stratton 4 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.85
Opportunities to be successful in course4.84
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.87
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.78
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.84
Curtis Bauer 8 median item responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Sara Pink 3 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.37
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
George Cole 1 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Sara Guengerich 6 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
John Beusterien 4 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Brendan P. Regan 5 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.80
Marco Antonio Domiguez 6 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Connie Scarborough 3 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Jonathan M Deen 1 median item responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Show all 16 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 6

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

3 more syllabi

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Reynolds, Andrew

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.