Course record SPAN

SPAN 3307

Introduction to Hispanic Literatures

Texas Tech University

4 sections25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2003–2025
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record

Professors 25 of 25

Connie Scarborough 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
88.0% A
12.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Genaro Perez 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
68.4% A
31.6% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Martinez 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.18GPA
41.0% A
47.0% B
6.0% C
0.0% D
6.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

George Cole 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.88GPA
23.6% A
41.6% B
34.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

MCVAY, TED E., JR. 16 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.96
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.53
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.68
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.37
John Beusterien 14 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.39
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.37
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.52
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.35
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.24
Luis Eduardo Crotte Pardo 12 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.87
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Mario Alberto Morera Jimenez 13 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.85
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.77
Luis Ignacio Pradanos-Garcia 21 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.72
Alberto Julian Perez 16 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.49
Opportunities to be successful in course4.39
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.41
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.27
Carmen Pereira-Muro 11 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
Sara Pink 3 median item responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.67
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.67
Sara Guengerich 14 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.41
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.66
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.69
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.52
Alicia Miklos 11 median item responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.91
Laura Jean Beard 15 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.93
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.13
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.07
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.07
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
Roberto Bravo 18 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Ruben Rodriguez 12 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.08
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Gerrardo Antonio Vega 17 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.59
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.76
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.69
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Stephen Corbett 14 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Jorge Zamora 16 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Yuriko Ikeda 13 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Antonio Ladeira 4 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Andrew R. Reynolds 4 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Maria Arciniega 18 median item responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.18
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course3.81
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.74
Hilda Yolanda Salazar 15 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Reynolds, Andrew

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.