Course record PSY

PSY 4323

Perception: Theories and Applications

Texas Tech University

3 sections12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 12

Megan Olson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.13GPA
46.9% A
28.6% B
17.3% C
5.1% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Patricia Delucia 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.75GPA
18.6% A
51.5% B
19.6% C
7.2% D
3.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Natalie Lodinger 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.57GPA
26.6% A
29.8% B
23.4% C
13.8% D
6.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Lucas Hess 39 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

39 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Isabel J. Meza 43 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

43 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Balagopal Raveendranath 23 median item responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.93
Course assignments facilitated learning3.37
Opportunities to be successful in course3.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.37
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.94
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.22
Elizabeth M Williamson 12 median item responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.25
Aleksei Proskurin 27 median item responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course3.70
Abigail G. Kortenhoeven 24 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Brad Howe 24 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.21
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.38
Show all 12 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Summer I 2026 · Section not specified

Laskowski, Thomas

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.