Course record PSS

PSS 1411

Principles of Horticulture

Texas Tech University

5 sections70 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 70

Loren Davis 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.65GPA
65.0% A
35.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ashley Elle 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.03GPA
43.8% A
31.5% B
14.6% C
3.4% D
6.7% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Russell Plowman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.95GPA
37.2% A
36.0% B
16.3% C
4.7% D
5.8% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jyotsna Sharma 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.71GPA
30.2% A
32.6% B
23.3% C
5.8% D
8.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Summer Loneragan 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.25GPA
21.7% A
29.0% B
21.7% C
10.1% D
17.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Maurer 54 median item responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

54 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.16
Opportunities to be successful in course3.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.23
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.32
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.06
Ellen S. Peffley 49 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

49 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.45
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Cynthia Mckenney 7 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.08
John Scott Armstrong 20 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.31
Igino Teolis 32 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.58
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.51
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
Show all 70 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 9

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

6 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.