Course record PHIL

PHIL 3303

Modern European Philosophy

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable6 professors
Evaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 6 of 6

Alice Jaime Overbaugh Sowaal 24 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Neal Judisch 17 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.39
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.24
Francesca Di Poppa 17 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.02
Course assignments facilitated learning3.97
Opportunities to be successful in course3.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.97
Darren Hick 19 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.87
Opportunities to be successful in course4.89
Sara Rachel Chant 18 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.61
John M. De Poe 7 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.93
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.84
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section 001

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section 001

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.