Course record PETR

PETR 3304

Formation Evaluation

Texas Tech University

1 section7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 7 of 7

Steven Henderson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.53GPA
60.0% A
35.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Paulus Suryono Adisoemarta 17 median item responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.77
Course assignments facilitated learning3.79
Opportunities to be successful in course3.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.04
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.07
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.63
Steve Henderson 13 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Richard Bateman 24 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.02
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.19
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.97
George Asquith 46 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

46 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Lloyd Heinze 29 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.66
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.76
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.52
Ellen Hall Taylor 73 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

73 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.06
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.