Course record / PETR
PETR 3304
Formation Evaluation
Texas Tech University
1 section7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data
This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Average GPA
Steven Henderson
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
AB
3.53GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.77 / 5
8 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.84
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Paulus Suryono Adisoemarta
17 median item responses
3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.79
Opportunities to be successful in course3.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.04
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.07
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.63
Steve Henderson
13 median item responses
4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Richard Bateman
24 median item responses
4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
24 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.19
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.97
George Asquith
46 median item responses
4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
46 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Lloyd Heinze
29 median item responses
4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
29 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.76
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.52
Ellen Hall Taylor
73 median item responses
4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
73 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.06
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2025 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2024 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.