Course record NRM

NRM 1300

Environmental Science as a Social Pursuit

Texas Tech University

3 sections14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2014–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 14

Wondmagegne Whibesilassie 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.57GPA
64.0% A
29.0% B
7.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Robin Verble 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.34GPA
53.5% A
34.3% B
7.1% C
2.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Matthew Van Landeghem 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.83GPA
32.0% A
37.0% B
19.0% C
6.0% D
6.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Carlos Villalobos 37 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.34
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Charles B. Hoitt 14 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.24
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.37
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
Allison Pease 3 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Nathan S. Gill 10 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.39
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.49
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.26
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
John Baccus 43 median item responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

43 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.18
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Britt Smith 17 median item responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.12
Michaela Mccown 4 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Show all 14 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section D01

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.