Course record / MUSI
MUSI 2309
Survey of Popular Music
Texas Tech University
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data
This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Sarai G. Brinker
16 median item responses
4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.48
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.55
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.55
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Brooke A. Ryan
16 median item responses
2.31Eval / 5
Overall2.31 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Seth M. Davis
17 median item responses
4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Cheng Yun Wang
73 median item responses
4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
73 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Jason P. Mullen
58 median item responses
4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
58 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.74
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Tristin A. Swisher
5 median item responses
4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
5 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.80
Roger Landes
33 median item responses
4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
33 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.34
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
Mark Morton
3 median item responses
3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
3 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.67
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Amelia Mcelveen
21 median item responses
4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
21 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.51
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.42
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.44
Jordan Hastings
10 median item responses
4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
10 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.80
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section 001
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2026 · Section D02
Davis, Seth
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
14 more syllabi
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Spring 2026 · Section 003
Landes, Roger · Instructor record
Spring 2026 · Section 004
Morton, Mark · Instructor record
Spring 2026 · Section D01
Davis, Seth
Spring 2026 · Section D02
McElveen, Amelia · Instructor record
Spring 2026 · Section D04
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2025 · Section 003
Morton, Mark · Instructor record
Fall 2025 · Section D01
McElveen, Amelia · Instructor record
Fall 2025 · Section D02
Davis, Seth
Spring 2025 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Spring 2025 · Section 002
Mullen, Jason
Spring 2025 · Section D03
Brinker, Sarai
Fall 2024 · Section not specified
Brinker, Sarai
Fall 2024 · Section not specified
Mullen, Jason
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.