Course record MUAP

MUAP 3208

Instrumental Conducting

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2009–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 8 of 8

Christopher Martin Anderson 25 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.12
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.16
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.48
Michael Asbill 26 median item responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.06
Course assignments facilitated learning3.12
Opportunities to be successful in course3.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.04
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.98
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.16
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.84
Benjamin Lorenzo 15 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.87
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.74
David Becker 9 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.89
Blair Williams 3 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Joel E. Pagan 8 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.88
Bruce Wilton Wood 5 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.58
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.62
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.55
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.69
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Eric M. Allen 13 median item responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.87
Opportunities to be successful in course4.89
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.66
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.