Course record MUAP

MUAP 2124

Group Keyboard Instruction IV

Texas Tech University

2 sections38 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2026
Flunk Score68/100
Strong

Professors 38 of 38

Xiao Yang 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.64GPA
91.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
9.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Meiling Jin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.48GPA
78.0% A
9.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
9.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Priyeshni Jayathika Peiris 8 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.15
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.07
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Carla Cash 11 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.70
Chen Shing Eliza Tsai Lin 8 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.82
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Jane Ann Wilson 5 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.20
Jaeyong Lee 8 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.69
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Uzziel Guzman 9 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.69
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.69
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Adam W. Smith 8 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.81
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.91
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.89
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.74
Ji Yang 8 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Yuway Chan 9 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.89
Min Ji Lee 9 median item responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.44
Course assignments facilitated learning3.89
Opportunities to be successful in course3.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.22
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.11
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.22
Wen Ling Chua 7 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Kug Hwa Lee 11 median item responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course3.66
Sun Lee 11 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Xin Wang 8 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Sun Yong Hwang 7 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
Laura Lennis Cortes 5 median item responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.35
Course assignments facilitated learning3.80
Opportunities to be successful in course3.80
Lingxu Peng 5 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Mikhail Maurice Johnson 3 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Brooke Trapp 4 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Pei Han Lin 4 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Jeyeon Kim Kim 5 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Johathan Guelfand 5 median item responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.80
Course assignments facilitated learning3.80
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Mauricio Starosta Neto 5 median item responses 3.22Eval / 5
Overall3.22 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.75
Course assignments facilitated learning3.67
Opportunities to be successful in course3.23
Ting Ting Goh 3 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course3.98
Han Gao 6 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Miri Park 1 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Robert Bolkcom 2 median item responses 2.67Eval / 5
Overall2.67 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.50
Course assignments facilitated learning2.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Nestor A. Guerrero Aguirre 3 median item responses 2.71Eval / 5
Overall2.71 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.33
Course assignments facilitated learning2.67
Opportunities to be successful in course2.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content2.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.67
Hanwen Yan 2 median item responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Yuwei Jiang 1 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Lora Gay Deahl 9 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.89
Melody Fried 10 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Kevin M Nadolski 8 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Jimmy Nga 10 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.70
Valeria Diaz Navarro 7 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.71
Leobardo Guerrero 4 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.