Course record MKT

MKT 4385

Marketing Strategy

Texas Tech University

3 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2014–2026
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 19

Kellilynn Frias 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.60GPA
60.0% A
39.0% B
1.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Dino Villegas Pizarro 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
49.0% A
41.0% B
10.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Shelby Hunt 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.26GPA
39.6% A
49.0% B
10.4% C
0.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kelli Frias 21 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Sreedhar Rao Madhavaram 13 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Alejandra Marin Melo 18 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.42
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.41
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Kt Manis 45 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

45 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.66
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.64
Babu L. John-Mariadoss 22 median item responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.58
Course assignments facilitated learning3.93
Opportunities to be successful in course3.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.91
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.08
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.05
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.03
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.08
Mark Fish 20 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Abhishek Nirjar 13 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.66
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Show all 19 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 17

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Hatfield, Hunter

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
14 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Melo, Alejandra

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Melo, Alejandra

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.