Course record / MKT
MKT 4359
Sales Management
Texas Tech University
4 sections18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record
Average GPA
Dino Villegas Pizarro
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
AB
3.52GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.56 / 5
23 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Robert Mcdonald
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
AB
3.16GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.79 / 5
59 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Kiran Pedada
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
AB
3.16GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.32 / 5
52 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
Mark Fish
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
AB
3.14GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.50 / 5
26 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Dennis Arnett
44 median item responses
4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
44 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course4.16
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.45
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.37
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.45
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Joseph Derby
30 median item responses
4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
30 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.07
Opportunities to be successful in course4.12
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.47
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Harry Gallagher
9 median item responses
4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
9 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.78
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Omer Topaloglu
35 median item responses
4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
35 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.54
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.31
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.03
Gavin Fox
10 median item responses
4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
10 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.66
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.68
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Andrew Dartt
21 median item responses
4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
21 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.10
Opportunities to be successful in course4.05
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.05
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Show all 18 professors ↓
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section 001
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
Fall 2026 · Section 002
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
Fall 2026 · Section 003
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
9 more syllabi
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Wiseman, Phillip
Fall 2025 · Section 001
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
Fall 2025 · Section 002
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
Spring 2025 · Section not specified
Turner, Gary
Spring 2025 · Section not specified
Wiseman, Phillip
Spring 2025 · Section 001
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
Spring 2025 · Section 002
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
Fall 2024 · Section 001
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
Fall 2024 · Section 002
Parvatiyar, Atul · Instructor record
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.