Course record MKT

MKT 3356

Marketing Research and Analysis

Texas Tech University

4 sections25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score45/100
Mixed record

Professors 25 of 25

Aniruddha Ashok Pangarkar 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
76.0% A
24.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mark Fish 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.09GPA
21.0% A
69.0% B
8.0% C
1.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Alexander Chaudhry 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.08GPA
27.6% A
54.1% B
17.3% C
1.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Deidre Popovich 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.98GPA
17.7% A
62.5% B
19.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kiran Pedada 26 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.85
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
Dale Duhan 25 median item responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.90
Course assignments facilitated learning3.76
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.35
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.69
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.47
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.70
Roy Howell 20 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.93
Course assignments facilitated learning3.76
Opportunities to be successful in course3.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.24
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.34
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.57
Mayukh Dass 57 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

57 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.61
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Masoud Moradi 29 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
John Statzer 20 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Riley Krotz 40 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

40 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Darima S. Fotheringham 43 median item responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5

43 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning3.84
Opportunities to be successful in course3.84
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.25
Gavin Fox 6 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.08
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.58
Johnathan Statzer 22 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Siavash Rashidi Sabet 22 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Kshitij Bhoumik 20 median item responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.15
Opportunities to be successful in course3.45
Lucas Lunt 33 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Kt Manis 38 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

38 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning4.51
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.47
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.34
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Vishag Anand Badrinarayanan 20 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.35
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.45
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
Yuewu Li 14 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.64
Rebecca Rabino 26 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.84
Course assignments facilitated learning4.87
Opportunities to be successful in course4.81
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.74
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.74
James Barry Wilcox 49 median item responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

49 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.90
Course assignments facilitated learning3.39
Opportunities to be successful in course3.23
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.08
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.02
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.16
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.47
Dennis Arnett 39 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

39 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.34
Opportunities to be successful in course4.19
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.47
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.51
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.34
Ankit Anand 30 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.31
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
Abhishek Nirjar 19 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.47
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 4

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Badrinarayanan, Vishag

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
1 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.