Course record / MGT
MGT 4375
International Management
Texas Tech University
2 sections27 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Average GPA
Jeremy Meuser
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
ABC
2.96GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.35 / 5
28 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Robert Davison
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
ABC
2.86GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.72 / 5
29 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.69
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.76
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.52
Dara M Szyliowicz
56 median item responses
4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
56 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.52
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Lars Sigve Bore
84 median item responses
4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
84 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.83
Opportunities to be successful in course3.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.10
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.93
Jun Xia
60 median item responses
4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
60 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.87
Opportunities to be successful in course3.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.98
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.46
Ron Mitchell
62 median item responses
4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
62 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.05
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.37
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.10
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.45
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.92
Adam Dewayne Bailey
45 median item responses
4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
45 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.09
Brandon Randolph-Seng
40 median item responses
4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
40 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.03
Opportunities to be successful in course3.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.03
Alejandra Marin Melo
52 median item responses
4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
52 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.24
Opportunities to be successful in course4.37
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.58
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.62
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.20
Olivia Aronson
47 median item responses
4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
47 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.28
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.11
Show all 27 professors ↓
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section 001
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2026 · Section 002
Instructor not extracted
Spring 2026 · Section 001
Instructor not extracted
7 more syllabi
Spring 2026 · Section 002
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2025 · Section 001
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2025 · Section 002
Instructor not extracted
Spring 2025 · Section 001
Instructor not extracted
Spring 2025 · Section 002
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2024 · Section 001
Instructor not extracted
Fall 2024 · Section 002
Instructor not extracted
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.