Course record ME

ME 4371

Engineering Design II

Texas Tech University

6 sections16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score83/100
Excellent

Professors 16 of 16

Atila Ertas 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.96GPA
96.0% A
4.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Branson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.77GPA
77.0% A
23.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jeffrey Hanson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
82.0% A
13.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Scott Fanning 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
77.0% A
22.0% B
1.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Turgut Batuhan Baturalp 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
76.0% A
20.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Craig Snoeyink 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.63GPA
63.0% A
37.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Burak Aksak 16 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
George Gray 11 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Gordon Christopher 10 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Stefania Chirico Scheele 17 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.51
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.66
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.66
James Yang 21 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.95
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.19
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.29
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.24
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Donald J. Docimo 13 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Paul F. Egan 7 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.14
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.14
Timothy Taylor Maxwell 20 median item responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning3.90
Opportunities to be successful in course3.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.96
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.24
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Stephen Ekwaro-Osire 21 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.03
Opportunities to be successful in course3.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.48
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.62
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.19
Derrick E Tate 20 median item responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 6

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

3 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.