Course record ME

ME 4370

Engineering Design I

Texas Tech University

6 sections23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score79/100
Strong

Professors 23 of 23

Atila Ertas 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.92GPA
92.0% A
8.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jeffrey Hanson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.87GPA
88.0% A
11.0% B
1.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Turgut Batuhan Baturalp 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.86GPA
86.0% A
14.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Craig Snoeyink 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.82GPA
82.0% A
18.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

George Gray 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.80GPA
80.0% A
20.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Archis Marathe 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.04GPA
21.0% A
62.0% B
17.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Stephen Ekwaro-Osire 25 median item responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.06
Course assignments facilitated learning4.03
Opportunities to be successful in course3.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.39
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.28
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.19
Derrick E Tate 18 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning3.85
Opportunities to be successful in course3.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.73
Jingzhou Yang 17 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.51
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.28
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.52
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.12
Taek Hyun Jang 20 median item responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.45
Course assignments facilitated learning3.67
Opportunities to be successful in course3.73
Gordon Christopher 15 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Joseph Dannemiller 24 median item responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Burak Aksak 20 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Scott Fanning 26 median item responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Paul F. Egan 13 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.90
Utku Gulbulak 14 median item responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.93
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Stefania Chirico Scheele 9 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Donald J. Docimo 20 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
A B M Abdul Ali Bhuiyan 7 median item responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.86
Course assignments facilitated learning3.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Raymond Eugene Pippin 16 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.35
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.52
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
James Yang 12 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.12
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Andrew Mosedale 7 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Timothy Taylor Maxwell 19 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.12
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.34
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.35
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.16
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 6

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

3 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.