Course record ME

ME 4334

Control of Dynamic Systems

Texas Tech University

6 sections23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work

Professors 23 of 23

Kalana Lakshitha Pothuwila Kankanamge 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.20GPA
47.0% A
35.0% B
14.0% C
0.0% D
4.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Beibei Ren 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.20GPA
43.0% A
34.0% B
23.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Alan Barhorst 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.77GPA
19.8% A
48.5% B
25.7% C
0.0% D
5.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Haopeng Zhang 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.57GPA
9.0% A
46.0% B
38.0% C
6.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

James Yang 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.50GPA
14.1% A
50.5% B
21.2% C
0.0% D
14.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jungkyu Kim 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.24GPA
8.0% A
27.0% B
53.0% C
6.0% D
6.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jordan Mitchell Berg 34 median item responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning3.72
Opportunities to be successful in course3.81
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.31
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.34
Sanjeeva Maithripala 21 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.66
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.22
Qing Hui 29 median item responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.82
Opportunities to be successful in course3.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.01
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.95
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.06
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.37
Seon Han 13 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.45
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.16
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.47
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.74
Jay Kim 29 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.97
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.06
Yao Ma 10 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.51
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
Shuxia Tang 32 median item responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.27
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.16
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.43
Donald J. Docimo 24 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Tanushree Roy 12 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.04
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Ilker Durukan 10 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.10
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Imiya Wickramasinghe 11 median item responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.82
Course assignments facilitated learning3.09
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.09
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.09
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.82
Xianlin Zeng 7 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Asanga Ratnaweera 15 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Han Na Cho 36 median item responses 3.30Eval / 5
Overall3.30 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.06
Course assignments facilitated learning3.97
Opportunities to be successful in course2.86
Chandika Annasiwatta 23 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course3.52
Bobby Green 24 median item responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.42
Opportunities to be successful in course3.37
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.49
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.03
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.05
Burak Aksak 20 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.45
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.