Course record ME

ME 3371

Heat Transfer

Texas Tech University

3 sections18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average

Professors 18 of 18

Sivapathasund Parameswaran 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.26GPA
48.5% A
33.3% B
15.2% C
1.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michelle Pantoya 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.10GPA
35.4% A
38.5% B
26.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Martin Azese 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.57GPA
26.0% A
30.0% B
26.0% C
9.0% D
9.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ming-Chien Chyu 26 median item responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.82
Course assignments facilitated learning3.52
Opportunities to be successful in course3.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.52
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.94
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.62
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.52
Darryl James 17 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course3.95
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.48
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.37
Senay Imam 13 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning3.97
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.11
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.53
Michael Nkainmbi Bello 26 median item responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.58
Course assignments facilitated learning3.77
Opportunities to be successful in course3.63
Haiwen Ge 7 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.86
A B M Abdul Ali Bhuiyan 46 median item responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

46 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.02
Opportunities to be successful in course3.78
Jonathan Simmons 24 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.48
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.78
Stefania Chirico Scheele 18 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.51
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.44
Jerzy Blawzdziewicz 14 median item responses 2.00Eval / 5
Overall2.00 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.93
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.07
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Juan Araya 3 median item responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.92
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Amar Patel 15 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.03
Course assignments facilitated learning4.12
Opportunities to be successful in course4.10
Matthew D Whigham 10 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.70
Jerry R. Dunn 16 median item responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.06
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.06
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.06
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.94
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.06
Luciano Castillo 19 median item responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.74
Course assignments facilitated learning3.53
Opportunities to be successful in course3.58
Sourav Barman 36 median item responses 3.04Eval / 5
Overall3.04 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.48
Opportunities to be successful in course2.98
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.