Course record ME

ME 3311

Materials Science

Texas Tech University

6 sections16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work

Professors 16 of 16

Alan Jankowski 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.15GPA
46.9% A
34.4% B
12.5% C
0.0% D
6.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Siheng Su 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.96GPA
25.0% A
50.0% B
21.0% C
4.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Yanzhang Ma 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.84GPA
24.0% A
46.9% B
21.9% C
5.2% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Shehan Haputhanthri 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.63GPA
16.0% A
47.0% B
29.0% C
0.0% D
8.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kaushik Das 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
6.3% A
52.1% B
39.6% C
0.0% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

George Gray 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.34GPA
7.3% A
38.5% B
38.5% C
11.5% D
4.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Javad Hashemi 37 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.12
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
Taek Hyun Jang 14 median item responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.99
Course assignments facilitated learning3.68
Opportunities to be successful in course3.21
Karl W. Bandilla 6 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Chang Dong Yeo 22 median item responses 3.21Eval / 5
Overall3.21 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.12
Opportunities to be successful in course4.16
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.09
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.23
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.82
Zhongkui Hong 8 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Jeffrey Hanson 5 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.06
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Archis Marathe 31 median item responses 3.03Eval / 5
Overall3.03 / 5

31 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.84
Course assignments facilitated learning3.35
Opportunities to be successful in course2.91
Jahangir Rasty 41 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

41 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course4.01
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.22
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.15
Yanyan Zhang 26 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.05
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.28
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Ricardo Esquivel Isern 7 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.29
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 10

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

7 more syllabi

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.