Course record ME

ME 3228

Materials and Mechanics Laboratory

Texas Tech University

2 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2008–2026
Flunk Score16/100
Needs work

Professors 19 of 19

Archis Marathe 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.86GPA
15.3% A
59.2% B
21.4% C
3.1% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Siheng Su 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.67GPA
6.3% A
54.2% B
39.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Erik Alfredo Chumacero Polanco 5 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Kafil Uddin Ahammed Chowdhury 5 median item responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.95
Geoff Fisher 50 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

50 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.72
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.64
A B M Abdul Ali Bhuiyan 14 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.16
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.62
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Jharna Chaudhuri 31 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

31 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.16
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.52
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.22
Kaushik Das 5 median item responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.98
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.06
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.03
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Pawan Maharjan 5 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Serdar Gorumlu 5 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Akash Jain 7 median item responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Niloofar Fathollahi 9 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Chandra Sekhar Meduri 6 median item responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.99
Course assignments facilitated learning4.08
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
George Gray 22 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.28
Geoffrey D Fisher 70 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

70 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
James Moore 8 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.49
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.49
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.49
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.49
Javad Hashemi 8 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.35
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.34
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.85
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.61
Shehan Haputhanthri 2 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.62
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Yanyan Zhang 22 median item responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.31
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.27
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.24
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 4

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

1 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.