Course record ME

ME 3165

Computational Fluid Dynamics

Texas Tech University

4 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2004–2022
Flunk Score79/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 19

Rakhitha Wishwajith Udugama Arachchilage 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.91GPA
92.9% A
5.1% B
2.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Al Rashid 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
91.8% A
7.1% B
1.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Evan Vargas 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.89GPA
89.0% A
11.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Xueda Shi 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.16GPA
46.2% A
38.5% B
7.7% C
2.2% D
5.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Andrew Mosedale 19 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.66
Ilker Durukan 22 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.96
Shamik Bhattacharya 16 median item responses 3.58Eval / 5
Overall3.58 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.81
Course assignments facilitated learning3.47
Opportunities to be successful in course3.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.54
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.31
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.31
Narendran Sridhar 12 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning4.12
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.99
Evan Shimek 26 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Sivapathasund Parameswaran 14 median item responses 1.86Eval / 5
Overall1.86 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized1.64
Course assignments facilitated learning1.97
Opportunities to be successful in course1.97
Show all 19 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.