Course record ME
ME 3165
Computational Fluid Dynamics
4 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2004–2022
Flunk Score79/100
Strong
Rakhitha Wishwajith Udugama Arachchilage 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.37 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.05
Course assignments facilitated learning4.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Al Rashid 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.05 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.12
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Evan Vargas 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Xueda Shi 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.16GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall3.73 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.03
Opportunities to be successful in course3.38
Andrew Mosedale 19 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.66
Ilker Durukan 22 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
22 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.96
Shamik Bhattacharya 16 median item responses 3.58Eval / 5
Overall3.58 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.81
Course assignments facilitated learning3.47
Opportunities to be successful in course3.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.54
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.31
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.31
Narendran Sridhar 12 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
12 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning4.12
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.99
Evan Shimek 26 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
26 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Sivapathasund Parameswaran 14 median item responses 1.86Eval / 5
Overall1.86 / 5
14 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized1.64
Course assignments facilitated learning1.97
Opportunities to be successful in course1.97
Bo Liu 16 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Doruk Isik 15 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
15 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.35
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Cynthia Sangang Tchoconte 9 median item responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
9 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.47
Course assignments facilitated learning3.70
Opportunities to be successful in course3.62
A B M Abdul Ali Bhuiyan 10 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
10 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.19
Morshed Parvez Hill Khandaker 41 median item responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
41 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.63
Course assignments facilitated learning3.18
Opportunities to be successful in course3.16
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.97
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.98
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.72
Stephen Ekwaro-Osire 14 median item responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
14 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course3.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.29
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.07
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Rajes Ram Muthukumar 9 median item responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
9 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.08
Course assignments facilitated learning3.36
Opportunities to be successful in course3.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.55
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.90
Suranga Dharmarathne 22 median item responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
22 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.05
Opportunities to be successful in course3.81
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.14
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.05
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.14
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.73
Haiwen Ge 11 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
11 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.