Course record ME

ME 2315

Computer-Aided Analysis

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable14 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 14

Sivapathasund Parameswaran 32 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning3.47
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.18
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.10
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.07
Timothy Taylor Maxwell 54 median item responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5

54 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.69
Course assignments facilitated learning3.05
Opportunities to be successful in course2.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.31
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.77
Erika Beth Komito Washington 25 median item responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Haileyesus Belay Endeshaw 17 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course3.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.93
Rajes Ram Muthukumar 19 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Turgut Batuhan Baturalp 6 median item responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Sonal Bhattacharya 14 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.05
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.07
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.06
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.16
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.05
Minliang Liu 32 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.51
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.36
Dhawal Buaria 14 median item responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.55
Course assignments facilitated learning3.66
Opportunities to be successful in course3.41
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.69
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.84
Eric Brannigan 3 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Show all 14 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.