Course record / ME
ME 2315
Computer-Aided Analysis
Texas Tech University
Grade distribution unavailable14 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data
This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Sivapathasund Parameswaran
32 median item responses
3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
32 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.47
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.18
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.10
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.07
Timothy Taylor Maxwell
54 median item responses
3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5
54 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.05
Opportunities to be successful in course2.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.31
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.77
Erika Beth Komito Washington
25 median item responses
4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
25 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Haileyesus Belay Endeshaw
17 median item responses
4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course3.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.93
Rajes Ram Muthukumar
19 median item responses
4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Turgut Batuhan Baturalp
6 median item responses
3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5
6 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Sonal Bhattacharya
14 median item responses
4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
14 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.05
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.07
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.06
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.16
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.05
Minliang Liu
32 median item responses
4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
32 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.51
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.36
Dhawal Buaria
14 median item responses
3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
14 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.66
Opportunities to be successful in course3.41
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.69
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.84
Eric Brannigan
3 median item responses
4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
3 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Show all 14 professors ↓
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section not specified
Park, Jaena
Fall 2026 · Section 003
Park, Jaena
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Bhattacharya, Sonal · Instructor record
2 more syllabi
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Bhattacharya, Sonal · Instructor record
Fall 2025 · Section 003
Instructor not extracted
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.