Course record MCOM

MCOM 5366

Seminar in Mass Communications Theory

Texas Tech University

5 sections33 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score70/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 33

John Velez 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.83GPA
86.9% A
11.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Weiwu Zhang 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
69.0% A
31.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Olan Farnall 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.49GPA
53.7% A
41.1% B
5.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Trenton Seltzer 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.43GPA
69.0% A
22.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
9.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Eric Rasmussen 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.43GPA
57.0% A
29.0% B
14.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Roger Saathoff 19 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Elizabeth A. Watts 11 median item responses 2.82Eval / 5
Overall2.82 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.64
Course assignments facilitated learning2.36
Opportunities to be successful in course2.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.09
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.09
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.55
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.09
Jimmie Lynn Reeves 20 median item responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.12
Course assignments facilitated learning3.87
Opportunities to be successful in course3.81
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.82
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.76
Tom Johnson 15 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.41
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.74
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.24
Kenton Wilkinson 17 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.35
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.41
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.35
Show all 33 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.