Course record MATH
MATH 5364
Computer Literacy and Programming I
1 section13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2021
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Christopher Monico 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.50 / 5
8 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.39
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.52
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.44
Padmanabhan Seshaiyer 6 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
6 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
David Gilliam 8 median item responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
8 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.88
Course assignments facilitated learning3.88
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Robert Byerly 6 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
6 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.51
Edward James Allen 20 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
20 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
Xiaochang Wang 9 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
9 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.35
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.35
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.95
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Akif Ibraguimov 13 median item responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.19
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.96
Eugenio Aulisa 10 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
10 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Kent Pearce 16 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.19
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.07
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Philip Smith 4 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
4 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.