Course record MATH

MATH 5361

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2002–2012

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 9 of 9

George Williams 3 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Gary Harris 8 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.13
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
James Surles 5 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.20
Christopher Monico 14 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.86
Jeremiah Dwyer 7 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Robert Byerly 8 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Margaret Williams 5 median item responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.20
Course assignments facilitated learning3.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.80
Carl R Seaquist 6 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
Padmanabhan Seshaiyer 5 median item responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.80
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.