Course record MATH

MATH 5311

Principles of Classical Applied Analysis II

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable7 professors
Evaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 7 of 7

Jeffrey Lee 7 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.29
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.71
Marianna A Shubov 12 median item responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Lawrence E. Schovanec 13 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.49
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.69
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.49
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Kevin Long 9 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.97
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.95
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.55
Edward James Allen 22 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.73
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.23
Lance Drager 6 median item responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Lourdes Juan 8 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.35
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.