Course record MATH

MATH 4350

Introduction to Real Analysis I

Texas Tech University

6 sections33 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work

Professors 33 of 33

Thilanka Arachchi Appuhamillage 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.21GPA
52.4% A
26.8% B
15.9% C
0.0% D
4.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Xiaochang Wang 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.79GPA
29.0% A
29.0% B
38.0% C
0.0% D
4.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Razvan Gelca 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.64GPA
25.0% A
22.6% B
45.2% C
3.6% D
3.6% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Akif Ibraguimov 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.18GPA
28.0% A
18.0% B
27.0% C
0.0% D
27.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Alexander Solynin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.10GPA
20.7% A
19.5% B
30.5% C
9.8% D
19.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Christopher Monico 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 1.78GPA
13.8% A
25.9% B
17.2% C
12.1% D
31.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Lourdes Juan 5 median item responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.60
Course assignments facilitated learning3.80
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Jeremiah Dwyer 21 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.85
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.61
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
Lance Drager 7 median item responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.05
Course assignments facilitated learning3.35
Opportunities to be successful in course3.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.99
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.03
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.19
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.06
Ira Lewis 6 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course3.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.05
Jeffrey Lee 14 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.90
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.99
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.24
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.58
Luan Hoang 10 median item responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.10
Opportunities to be successful in course3.70
Wayne Lewis 10 median item responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.04
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course3.18
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.20
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.20
Alastair Hamilton 15 median item responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course3.70
Dmitri Pavlov 5 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
James Surles 6 median item responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.33
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Harold Dean Victory 5 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.40
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Giorgio Bornia 15 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.73
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.81
Linda Allen 20 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Amin Rahman 17 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.41
Phuong Nguyen 12 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.08
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Luigi Ferraro 4 median item responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course3.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Magdalena Toda 9 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.89
Sophia Jang 11 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course3.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.18
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.27
Gary Harris 16 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.19
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Anatoliy Korchagin 28 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.96
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.82
George Williams 30 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.73
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Ram Iyer 15 median item responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.15
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.07
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.53
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.77
David Weinberg 11 median item responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.09
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.45
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.82
Edward James Allen 19 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.68
Dimitri Volchenkov 9 median item responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.72
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.96
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.69
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Daniel Grady 6 median item responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Hung T. Tran 6 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.