Course record MATH

MATH 4343

Mathematical Statistics II

Texas Tech University

1 section18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 18 of 18

Jingyong Su 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
37.8% A
18.9% B
18.9% C
12.2% D
12.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

James Surles 14 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.05
Course assignments facilitated learning4.26
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.55
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.48
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.36
William B. Lindquist 3 median item responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Rui Wang 11 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.29
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.35
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Shan Sun 6 median item responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Petros Ioanni Hadjicostas 14 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Adao Trindade 12 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.11
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.48
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Souparno Ghosh 17 median item responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.34
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Jiho Park 20 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.35
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Michael Williams 18 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Fangyuan Zhang 15 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning4.40
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Brent Lindquist 7 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Tommy Lu 28 median item responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.14
Course assignments facilitated learning3.75
Opportunities to be successful in course2.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.39
Tom Lu 14 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.39
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.09
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
Svetlozar Rachev 5 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course3.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.02
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.29
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.02
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.12
Davide Lauria 15 median item responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.05
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.01
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.18
Robert L Paige 11 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.66
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
Leif Ellingson 26 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.66
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.