Course record MATH

MATH 4330

Mathematical Computing

Texas Tech University

1 section17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2003–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 17 of 17

Lance Drager 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.10GPA
51.6% A
34.4% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
14.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Wei Guo 23 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course3.52
Dimitri Volchenkov 16 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Josh Padgett 21 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Christopher Monico 9 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.62
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.55
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.66
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.51
Ram Iyer 9 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.14
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.08
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.20
Colton Mikes 16 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.72
Xiaochang Wang 9 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.78
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Padmanabhan Seshaiyer 19 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.89
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.89
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.84
James Surles 9 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
David Gilliam 13 median item responses 3.35Eval / 5
Overall3.35 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.62
Course assignments facilitated learning3.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.23
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content2.85
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.08
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.23
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.15
Robert C Kirby 5 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.40
Jeffrey Lee 10 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning3.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.80
Petros Ioanni Hadjicostas 7 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.14
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Philip Smith 11 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.72
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.91
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
John Calhoun 22 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Giorgio Bornia 12 median item responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section 001

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.