Course record / MATH
MATH 4000
Selected Topics
Texas Tech University
Grade distribution unavailable13 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data
This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Carl R Seaquist
17 median item responses
4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.87
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.82
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.66
Harold Dean Victory
5 median item responses
4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
5 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.60
Alex Solynin
12 median item responses
4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
12 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Ira Lewis
6 median item responses
4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
6 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Robert Byerly
8 median item responses
4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
8 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Kevin Long
3 median item responses
4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
3 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Robert L Paige
7 median item responses
3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
7 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.71
Opportunities to be successful in course3.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.14
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.14
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.43
Jeremiah Dwyer
17 median item responses
4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
Linda Allen
42 median item responses
4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
42 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.91
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
Mara Dicle Neusel
4 median item responses
4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
4 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.50
Show all 13 professors ↓
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section D01
Server, Isabell
Summer II 2026 · Section D21
Instructor not extracted
Spring 2026 · Section 007
Volchenkov, Dimitri · Instructor record
6 more syllabi
Spring 2026 · Section 013
Ledet, Arne · Instructor record
Summer II 2025 · Section D21
Instructor not extracted
Spring 2025 · Section 013
Ledet, Arne · Instructor record
Fall 2024 · Section 001
Christensen, Lars · Instructor record
Fall 2024 · Section 004
Hoang, Luan · Instructor record
Fall 2024 · Section D02
Instructor not extracted
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.