Course record MATH
MATH 3322
Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2011
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Roger Wilson Barnard 15 median item responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
15 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.93
Course assignments facilitated learning3.87
Opportunities to be successful in course3.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.93
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.14
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.40
Ramakrishnan Venkataraman 18 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
18 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.45
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.53
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.41
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.43
Manjula Samanmale Sugathadasa 19 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.66
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Robert Byerly 12 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
12 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Lance Drager 23 median item responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
23 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.12
Course assignments facilitated learning3.81
Opportunities to be successful in course3.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.06
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.58
Kent Pearce 19 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.26
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.37
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.47
David Weinberg 13 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.54
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.69
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Lih-Ing Roeger 14 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
14 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.54
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Razvan Gelca 31 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
31 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.42
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
Patricia Schovanec 31 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
31 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.84
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.87
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.87
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.87
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.87
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.77
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.