Course record MATH
MATH 2350
Grade distribution unavailable61 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2011
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Razvan Gelca 23 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
23 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.35
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.59
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.12
Carl R Seaquist 29 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
29 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
David Weinberg 24 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
24 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.27
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.45
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.19
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.47
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Kirth Sarachchandra Walgama 26 median item responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
26 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.04
Course assignments facilitated learning3.81
Opportunities to be successful in course3.69
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.62
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.77
Magdalena Toda 18 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
18 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.47
Mara Dicle Neusel 19 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.76
Victor Shubov 21 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
21 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.81
Harold Dean Victory 25 median item responses 3.41Eval / 5
Overall3.41 / 5
25 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.06
Course assignments facilitated learning2.97
Opportunities to be successful in course3.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.94
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.58
Lourdes Juan 30 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
30 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.24
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.35
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.99
William H. Gustafson 19 median item responses 3.46Eval / 5
Overall3.46 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.42
Course assignments facilitated learning3.11
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.95
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.05
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.