Course record MATH
MATH 1430
Introductory Mathematical Analysis With Review
Grade distribution unavailable37 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2015
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
P Harshini Priyanthi Fernando 18 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
18 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.99
Course assignments facilitated learning3.82
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.08
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.60
Paul D Pierce 14 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
14 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.23
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.12
Soad Yousef Abuhawas 15 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
15 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.18
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.66
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.14
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.23
Carl R Seaquist 12 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
12 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Patricia Schovanec 14 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
14 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.85
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Junlong Ji 6 median item responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
6 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Billy J Duke 17 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Rachel S Cline 13 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.84
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.74
Benjamin Aaron Bailey 16 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
James Brown 17 median item responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.16
Opportunities to be successful in course3.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.18
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.99
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.