Course record MATH

MATH 1350

Analytical Geometry

Texas Tech University

2 sections42 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 42

Benoit Ahanda 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.03GPA
42.9% A
39.3% B
6.0% C
2.4% D
9.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Vazgen Zakaryan 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.70GPA
37.6% A
23.7% B
21.5% C
6.5% D
10.8% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Alexandre Yur Evich Solynine 16 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.53
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.06
Cheryl A Peterson 18 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning3.55
Opportunities to be successful in course3.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.87
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.87
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.48
Shawna Allen 28 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.39
Mara Dicle Neusel 17 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Edward W Swim 18 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.10
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.55
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.51
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.66
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Brian L Miller 17 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.08
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.84
Robert K Mccormack 20 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.49
Chandrani Banerjee 10 median item responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning3.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.35
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.65
Show all 42 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 4

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

1 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.