Course record / MATH
MATH 1350
Analytical Geometry
Texas Tech University
2 sections42 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Average GPA
Benoit Ahanda
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
AB
3.03GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.63 / 5
24 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Vazgen Zakaryan
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
ABC
2.70GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.76 / 5
24 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Alexandre Yur Evich Solynine
16 median item responses
4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.53
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.06
Cheryl A Peterson
18 median item responses
3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
18 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.55
Opportunities to be successful in course3.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.87
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.87
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.48
Shawna Allen
28 median item responses
4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
28 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.39
Mara Dicle Neusel
17 median item responses
4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Edward W Swim
18 median item responses
4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
18 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.10
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.55
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.51
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.66
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Brian L Miller
17 median item responses
4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.08
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.84
Robert K Mccormack
20 median item responses
4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
20 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.49
Chandrani Banerjee
10 median item responses
4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
10 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.35
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.65
Show all 42 professors ↓
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section 001
Surowiec, Malgorzata · Instructor record
Spring 2026 · Section 001
Surowiec, Malgorzata · Instructor record
Fall 2025 · Section not specified
Venkatachalapathy, Pavithra · Instructor record
1 more syllabi
Spring 2025 · Section 001
Surowiec, Malgorzata · Instructor record
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.