Course record LING

LING 5330

Second Language Acquisition

Texas Tech University

1 section7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 7 of 7

Kimi Nakatsukasa 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kristen E. Michelson 9 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
Idoia Elola 9 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.78
Yongzhi Miao 9 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Greta Griffee 10 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.82
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Andrew Farley 14 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Bill Vanpatten 17 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.