Course record LAW

LAW 5405

Civil Procedure

Texas Tech University

4 sections10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2004–2025
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 10

Richard Murphy 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.49GPA
8.0% A
46.0% B
36.0% C
8.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Robert Weninger 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.48GPA
16.0% A
30.0% B
41.0% C
12.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Bryan Camp 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.39GPA
12.9% A
36.6% B
32.7% C
10.9% D
6.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Alison Myhra 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.39GPA
9.0% A
32.0% B
48.0% C
11.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rick Rosen 32 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Dennis A Olson 57 median item responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

57 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.84
John Watts 29 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.26
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
Richard Rosen 54 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

54 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.70
Dustin Benham 50 median item responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

50 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.98
Opportunities to be successful in course4.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.96
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.98
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.98
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.98
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.94
Angela Marie Laughlin 52 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

52 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.23
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.16
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.