Course record ISQS

ISQS 6337

Scripting Languages

Texas Tech University

1 section7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 7 of 7

Jaeki Song 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.77GPA
77.0% A
23.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

James Burns 6 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.58
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.52
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Surya Yadav 4 median item responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.75
Yuan Jin 25 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
David Lucus 15 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.37
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.53
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
William Graue 15 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.51
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.74
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.70
Richard Greenhill 8 median item responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course2.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.