Course record IE

IE 5331

Special Topics in Industrial Engineering

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable21 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 21

Iris Violeta Rivero 7 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.85
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Timothy Matis 8 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.96
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.52
Hong-Chao Zhang 15 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Patrick Patterson 6 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.54
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.24
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.52
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
David A Wyrick 2 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.66
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.82
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.97
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.62
Susan D Urban 5 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.74
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Joseph Edward Urban 5 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Dan Mcgrath 6 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.37
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.85
Ismael De Farias 6 median item responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.40
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.42
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.26
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.37
Yisha Xiang 8 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.95
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Show all 21 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.