Course record ID

ID 4383

Building Information Modeling (bim) For Interior Design

Texas Tech University

1 section9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2022
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 9 of 9

Michelle Pearson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.55GPA
65.9% A
26.4% B
5.5% C
2.2% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Zane Douglas Curry 12 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.27
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.49
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Rosemary Elizabeth Peggram 14 median item responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.93
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.64
Hiathem El-Hammali 12 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning3.58
Opportunities to be successful in course3.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.10
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.22
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.10
Akm Islam 11 median item responses 3.20Eval / 5
Overall3.20 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning2.81
Opportunities to be successful in course2.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.33
Michelle Pinson 15 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.80
Course assignments facilitated learning3.95
Opportunities to be successful in course3.96
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.36
Saman Jamshidi 5 median item responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Seyedehnastaran Hashemi 9 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.78
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Farzane Omidi 13 median item responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.23
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.