Course record ID

ID 2381

Interior Design Studio II

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2014–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 8 of 8

Erin Schambureck 8 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Lori Anderson-Guerrero 14 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.39
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Reem Bagais 11 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Pariya Sheykhmaleki 12 median item responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Ladan Khalvati 14 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.62
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Don Collier 13 median item responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.28
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.41
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.44
Sharran Parkinson 5 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.74
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Fatemeh Dianat 10 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.