Course record HDFS

HDFS 3390

Research Methods in Human Development and Family Sciences

Texas Tech University

5 sections24 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2026
Flunk Score32/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 24

Ronda Eade 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.56GPA
62.0% A
33.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Zhen Cong 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.03GPA
34.7% A
41.1% B
21.1% C
0.0% D
3.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jennifer Chapman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
27.3% A
46.5% B
24.2% C
2.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Shu Yuan 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.88GPA
22.9% A
51.0% B
20.8% C
2.1% D
3.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Monica Martin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.83GPA
28.0% A
44.0% B
17.0% C
6.0% D
5.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kristina Marie Keyton 25 median item responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.27
Course assignments facilitated learning4.15
Opportunities to be successful in course4.26
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
Sarah C Kulkofsky 23 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Rachel Engler 24 median item responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.16
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.52
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.87
Zhe Wang 22 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Alan Reifman 18 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.06
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course3.94
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.51
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.18
Show all 24 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.