Course record HDFS

HDFS 3310

Prenatal and Infant Development

Texas Tech University

5 sections24 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 24

Andrea Parker 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.48GPA
63.3% A
25.5% B
8.2% C
2.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Stacy Johnson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.24GPA
50.0% A
36.0% B
6.0% C
4.0% D
4.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jennifer Chapman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.23GPA
43.0% A
37.0% B
20.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Yvonne Caldera 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.13GPA
41.0% A
39.0% B
16.0% C
1.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mitzi Ziegner 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.98GPA
29.9% A
46.4% B
18.6% C
2.1% D
3.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Mccarty 16 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.95
Course assignments facilitated learning4.01
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.96
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Sybil Hart 21 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.69
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.52
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
Jackie Driskill 34 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.08
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.66
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.02
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.89
Shana Hamilton 30 median item responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning3.96
Opportunities to be successful in course4.11
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.28
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.10
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.14
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Melissa Denson 26 median item responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.05
Course assignments facilitated learning3.70
Opportunities to be successful in course3.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.03
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.04
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.45
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.12
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.36
Show all 24 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 10

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

7 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.