Course record GIST

GIST 5302

Spatial Analysis and Modeling

Texas Tech University

1 section15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2013–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 15 of 15

Guofeng Cao 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.59GPA
69.1% A
27.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ashley Morris 11 median item responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.91
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Tarek Kandakji 7 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Congliang Zhou 5 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Chan Mi Lee 6 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Kevin Mulligan 10 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
C Vannice 12 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.92
Michael Harrigan 10 median item responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning3.60
Opportunities to be successful in course3.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.20
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.10
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.50
Ying Liu 6 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Xiaopeng Song 11 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Shu Li 6 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Tony Wang 8 median item responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.97
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.97
Zhen Song 5 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course3.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Santash Seshadni 9 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.78
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Xuantong Wang 6 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.87
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.