Course record GIST

GIST 4302

Spatial Analysis and Modeling

Texas Tech University

1 section15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2012–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 15 of 15

Guofeng Cao 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.51GPA
14.6% A
44.8% B
27.1% C
4.2% D
9.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Tarek Kandakji 7 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.49
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Kevin Mulligan 5 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.49
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.26
Santash Seshadni 7 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Congliang Zhou 3 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.27
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Chan Mi Lee 6 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
C Vannice 7 median item responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.84
Course assignments facilitated learning4.93
Opportunities to be successful in course4.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.93
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.93
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.85
Michael Harrigan 8 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.19
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Ying Liu 8 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Ashley Morris 4 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Xiaopeng Song 3 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Shu Li 6 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Tony Wang 19 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.37
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course4.37
Xuantong Wang 6 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.39
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.42
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.28
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.41
Zhen Song 4 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.