Course record FIN

FIN 4324

Credit and Lending

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 12

William P. Dukes 22 median item responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning3.52
Opportunities to be successful in course3.31
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.26
Stephen Sears 24 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
David R Kuipers 26 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.61
Course assignments facilitated learning3.62
Opportunities to be successful in course3.34
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.14
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.01
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.82
Ryan John Whitby 29 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.38
Mike Mauldin 17 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.93
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.93
Michael D. Mauldin 17 median item responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.95
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.89
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.98
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.91
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.95
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.95
Christine Panasian 25 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.72
Opportunities to be successful in course3.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.12
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.20
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.96
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.60
Takeshi Nishikawa 43 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

43 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.02
Opportunities to be successful in course3.84
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.23
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.49
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.09
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Jeffrey Mercer 15 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.36
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.49
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.31
Pinghsun Huang 30 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.66
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.70
Show all 12 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.