Course record FIN

FIN 3322

Corporation Finance I

Texas Tech University

2 sections20 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2007–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average

Professors 20 of 20

James Bulsiewicz 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
58.8% A
26.8% B
10.3% C
2.1% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Robert Ritchey 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.79GPA
24.7% A
39.5% B
27.2% C
6.2% D
2.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

John Cooney 24 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.35
Stuart Leigh Gillan 24 median item responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.59
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.36
Lawrence Zhao 24 median item responses 2.83Eval / 5
Overall2.83 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.48
Course assignments facilitated learning3.34
Opportunities to be successful in course2.66
Bailey K. Allen 15 median item responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Chengzhi Zhao 41 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

41 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.31
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.24
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.11
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.07
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Munhee Han 36 median item responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.12
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.97
Seza Danisoglu 5 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Drew Winters 36 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Rumpa Biswas 38 median item responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

38 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.39
Course assignments facilitated learning4.18
Opportunities to be successful in course3.61
Eric Valenzuela 12 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Maria Sochi 32 median item responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Mengxi Chen 33 median item responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course3.79
Farzad Abbasnezhad Oskooei 43 median item responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5

43 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.52
Course assignments facilitated learning3.97
Opportunities to be successful in course3.87
Meruyert Nussambayeva 33 median item responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.08
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.97
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.89
Rasheek Irtisam 9 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
George D Cashman 27 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.22
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.99
Ezgi H. Ottolenghi 30 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.52
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Zhen Ye 20 median item responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.77
Course assignments facilitated learning3.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.89
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 9

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

6 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.