Course record FIN

FIN 3321

Financial Statement Analysis

Texas Tech University

1 section16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 16

Mark Moore 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.57GPA
20.0% A
35.8% B
30.5% C
8.4% D
5.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Keldon J Bauer 40 median item responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

40 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning3.87
Opportunities to be successful in course3.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.19
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.55
Frank Sanford Smith 40 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

40 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.39
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.14
Norman Dargitz Clement 37 median item responses 3.12Eval / 5
Overall3.12 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.73
Course assignments facilitated learning2.61
Opportunities to be successful in course2.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.27
Elaine D Flynt 37 median item responses 3.31Eval / 5
Overall3.31 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.13
Course assignments facilitated learning2.85
Opportunities to be successful in course2.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.90
John Cooney 33 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.24
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.59
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.24
Bobby Merriman 28 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Rasheek Irtisam 25 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Zhiwei Zhu 28 median item responses 2.81Eval / 5
Overall2.81 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.07
Course assignments facilitated learning2.84
Opportunities to be successful in course3.05
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content2.76
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.74
Mohammad Nazrul Islam 33 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.16
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.24
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Show all 16 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 11

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

8 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section 002

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section 003

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section 004

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.