Course record FCSE

FCSE 3303

Educational Processes for Community Engagement

Texas Tech University

3 sections12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2026
Flunk Score76/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 12

Amanda Holland 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.78GPA
81.6% A
17.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Carmen Pedersen 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
89.0% A
6.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
5.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Veronica Saldana 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.53GPA
76.8% A
13.1% B
2.0% C
2.0% D
6.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jamie Nicole Hansard 28 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning4.04
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.19
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.89
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
Letitia Janet Killman 14 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.07
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.14
Arnessa Dotson 31 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

31 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course3.90
Kristie Storms 5 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Kyle L. Roberson 4 median item responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.10
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
David Wilder 13 median item responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.78
Course assignments facilitated learning3.84
Opportunities to be successful in course3.98
Veronica-Suarez Saldana 4 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Show all 12 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Roberson, Kyle

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.